WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:10.000
Please welcome Jonathan.

00:10.000 --> 00:21.000
Hmm, first challenge of the day.

00:21.000 --> 00:25.000
All right.

00:25.000 --> 00:30.000
Well, first of all, so that was a great talk about individual communities.

00:30.000 --> 00:37.000
My job now is to expand that to say that we need to be more than individuals in the tech community.

00:37.000 --> 00:39.000
We need to bring more people in.

00:39.000 --> 00:43.000
So who knows what an Ospo is?

00:43.000 --> 00:44.000
Job is easy.

00:44.000 --> 00:50.000
So for folks who don't, that's also great because we're going to explore what they might be in the future.

00:50.000 --> 00:51.000
Fingers crossed.

00:51.000 --> 00:54.000
So an Ospo is an open source.

00:54.000 --> 00:59.000
If anyone can make like lawn order sounds, program office, don't, don't.

00:59.000 --> 01:07.000
So program office comes with a specific sort of field to it.

01:07.000 --> 01:13.000
It's a program which has a definition that has to be followed and it's an office.

01:13.000 --> 01:16.000
It's something I go to get my teeth clean or something like that.

01:16.000 --> 01:20.000
It is outside of where I normally exist.

01:20.000 --> 01:24.000
So to kick things off, I am from Burlington for a month.

01:24.000 --> 01:30.000
We are starting to do a lot of what I'll be talking about today, which is uniting a lot of our communities.

01:30.000 --> 01:32.000
Starting with the tech community.

01:32.000 --> 01:34.000
And we just had a really good meet up the other week.

01:34.000 --> 01:39.000
And someone came in and talked to us about fraud, essentially.

01:39.000 --> 01:42.000
They were showed us this slide, feel free to read.

01:42.000 --> 01:48.000
It's a lot of information about how much some people are really bad and steal from other people.

01:48.000 --> 01:53.000
The core demographic that gets stolen from is actually young people.

01:53.000 --> 01:56.000
But the most amount of money gets stolen from the other.

01:56.000 --> 01:58.000
People is 65 or plus, 70 plus.

01:58.000 --> 02:01.000
And their solution to this was to create a conference.

02:01.000 --> 02:02.000
Let's have a conference.

02:02.000 --> 02:04.000
Let's bring in someone from the FBI.

02:04.000 --> 02:08.000
And let's have them talk about how not to get scammed.

02:08.000 --> 02:11.000
How not to lose your money to fraud, how not to click that link.

02:11.000 --> 02:13.000
Look for the little security symbol.

02:13.000 --> 02:14.000
That sort of thing.

02:15.000 --> 02:19.000
It was an interesting solution and we'll come back to this a little later.

02:19.000 --> 02:24.000
So when we think about open source, at least when I think about open source in this context,

02:24.000 --> 02:27.000
I'm here for four key reasons.

02:27.000 --> 02:28.000
One is the philosophy.

02:28.000 --> 02:31.000
This is why I got into this space in the first place.

02:31.000 --> 02:33.000
You just start building something.

02:33.000 --> 02:35.000
That's it.

02:35.000 --> 02:40.000
You can expand on this and you can look at the self-serving nature of open source.

02:40.000 --> 02:43.000
You just start building something that you need.

02:44.000 --> 02:46.000
And then you bring in the collaborative nature.

02:46.000 --> 02:48.000
You just start building something that you need.

02:48.000 --> 02:49.000
That someone else also needs.

02:49.000 --> 02:51.000
So you're building it with them.

02:51.000 --> 02:56.000
And then there's this interesting layer where you start to leverage the self-service

02:56.000 --> 03:01.000
Self-service nature of open source to support the commons.

03:01.000 --> 03:03.000
So you just, I have to read this off the screen.

03:03.000 --> 03:06.000
You just start building something you need with someone else who needs the same thing.

03:06.000 --> 03:10.000
Or just want to learn some code, collaborative practices, project management, community management, whatever.

03:10.000 --> 03:14.000
So they increase their employment prospects because they want to challenge or for fun.

03:14.000 --> 03:16.000
They're upskilling.

03:16.000 --> 03:20.000
They're just bored with their day jobs so they want to do something else.

03:20.000 --> 03:22.000
They want to learn a new programming language.

03:22.000 --> 03:25.000
They're not necessarily interested in the thing you're building.

03:25.000 --> 03:33.000
But they're interested in the outcomes that they get from helping you build that thing that you are building.

03:34.000 --> 03:41.000
So there is this subsection, this educational program within numfocus called Pi data,

03:41.000 --> 03:45.000
which I think exemplifies some of these core principles.

03:45.000 --> 03:48.000
Pi data is very large.

03:48.000 --> 03:51.000
It's global 200 plus thousand members.

03:51.000 --> 03:52.000
They've gone through.

03:52.000 --> 03:54.000
They don't all go to all the meetups, obviously.

03:54.000 --> 03:57.000
The meetups are actually fairly small unless you're one of the big events.

03:57.000 --> 03:59.000
Pi data, London, Pi data, New York, etc.

03:59.000 --> 04:01.000
But people go through this program.

04:01.000 --> 04:02.000
They learn about Python.

04:02.000 --> 04:03.000
They learn about data science.

04:03.000 --> 04:04.000
They learn about Julia.

04:04.000 --> 04:06.000
All this fun stuff about open source.

04:06.000 --> 04:07.000
They meet friends.

04:07.000 --> 04:08.000
They network.

04:08.000 --> 04:09.000
They can find jobs.

04:09.000 --> 04:10.000
That sort of things.

04:10.000 --> 04:11.000
Fantastic program.

04:11.000 --> 04:13.000
If you don't know about it, go to Pi data.

04:13.000 --> 04:14.000
The website.

04:14.000 --> 04:15.000
Learn more about it.

04:15.000 --> 04:16.000
Point being, it's huge.

04:16.000 --> 04:17.000
It's global.

04:17.000 --> 04:18.000
It's effective.

04:18.000 --> 04:20.000
It makes change around the world.

04:20.000 --> 04:23.000
So when we expand that beyond Pi data.

04:23.000 --> 04:26.000
I'm sure everyone's seen most of these numbers.

04:26.000 --> 04:28.000
Open source is huge.

04:28.000 --> 04:30.000
I've got to say that again.

04:30.000 --> 04:32.000
Open source is huge.

04:32.000 --> 04:36.000
It is probably the largest institution that exists in the world.

04:36.000 --> 04:38.000
It's more impactful than universities.

04:38.000 --> 04:40.000
It's more impactful than governments.

04:40.000 --> 04:42.000
Trillions of dollars of GDP.

04:42.000 --> 04:43.000
So we think right now.

04:43.000 --> 04:44.000
How do you measure this?

04:44.000 --> 04:49.000
But you've got, you're affecting hundreds of thousands of people that go through this institution.

04:49.000 --> 04:53.000
Learn how to contribute collaboratively to software.

04:53.000 --> 04:56.000
And hopefully more things as I'll explain in a second.

04:56.000 --> 05:00.000
And exit with a job, with a degree, not maybe a piece of paper or a certificate.

05:00.000 --> 05:01.000
But they have a degree.

05:01.000 --> 05:04.000
They're experts in coding or development or community management or anything.

05:04.000 --> 05:07.000
They're experts in open source.

05:07.000 --> 05:08.000
We have to leverage that.

05:08.000 --> 05:13.000
We have to respect that we are probably the largest open, the largest institution in the world.

05:13.000 --> 05:15.000
Creating some of the most good in the world.

05:15.000 --> 05:18.000
The biggest changes.

05:18.000 --> 05:20.000
So we're reaching this point now.

05:20.000 --> 05:21.000
We're recognizing it.

05:21.000 --> 05:25.000
Well, what's the risk that could come if we don't fully embrace

05:25.000 --> 05:26.000
everything that we do?

05:26.000 --> 05:30.000
The technology we build, the communities that we exist within.

05:30.000 --> 05:34.000
Don't build technology that exists solely in those communities.

05:34.000 --> 05:37.000
We affect everything.

05:37.000 --> 05:46.000
If we don't appreciate that aspect, we're going to end up being some of the institutions that we might

05:46.000 --> 05:48.000
Not appreciate currently.

05:48.000 --> 05:52.000
We might become another siloed sort of corporate open source endeavor.

05:52.000 --> 05:57.000
We might have local communities standing completely outside of the open source development world.

05:57.000 --> 06:02.000
Standing completely outside of the academic silo, standing completely outside of the local tech communities,

06:02.000 --> 06:07.000
which are outside of the policy makers outside of the tech industry, which is developing the commercial aspect of everything.

06:07.000 --> 06:12.000
And then we're going to try and smoosh it all together as the separate silo is probably not going to work well.

06:12.000 --> 06:15.000
Probably going to end up with some negative consequences.

06:15.000 --> 06:21.000
This is a real risk that I fear is more likely to happen than the alternative right now.

06:21.000 --> 06:31.000
So another story that this same meet up, I met some folks who lead a group called Code for BTV.

06:31.000 --> 06:36.000
It's an extension of Code for America, if anyone knows what that is.

06:36.000 --> 06:41.000
They had a community member.

06:41.000 --> 06:42.000
Let's start this way.

06:42.000 --> 06:46.000
There was a community member who had a baby.

06:46.000 --> 06:51.000
And then it was no longer a baby and they had all this baby equipment wasn't used too much.

06:51.000 --> 06:53.000
And it's Vermont.

06:53.000 --> 06:54.000
We love supporting our community.

06:54.000 --> 06:55.000
She's excited.

06:55.000 --> 06:56.000
Hey, I'm not going to throw this out.

06:56.000 --> 06:59.000
I'm not going to donate it somewhere where it can get resolved.

06:59.000 --> 07:01.000
I'm just going to give it to someone else who needs it.

07:01.000 --> 07:03.000
So that's what she did.

07:03.000 --> 07:04.000
People loved that.

07:04.000 --> 07:07.000
And so more people started saying, hey, I have this slightly used baby equipment.

07:07.000 --> 07:10.000
Can you find someone who needs it and give it to them?

07:10.000 --> 07:11.000
So she did.

07:11.000 --> 07:13.000
And this grew pretty rapidly.

07:13.000 --> 07:15.000
And it was managed in spreadsheets.

07:15.000 --> 07:19.000
And that, as amazing as it was, was not very effective.

07:19.000 --> 07:24.000
So what ended up happening is she connected with these folks at Code for BTV.

07:24.000 --> 07:28.000
And they connected her with developers who were able to create an application.

07:28.000 --> 07:30.000
They're currently creating the application.

07:30.000 --> 07:32.000
That is going to streamline this process.

07:32.000 --> 07:36.000
Make her be able to continue to doing what she's continue to do, what she's doing.

07:36.000 --> 07:38.000
And just make it easier.

07:38.000 --> 07:39.000
So she can kind of scale it.

07:39.000 --> 07:41.000
If she wants it, whatever she wants to do, really.

07:41.000 --> 07:44.000
It's just going to be a simpler process.

07:44.000 --> 07:49.000
That to me is amazing.

07:49.000 --> 07:51.000
So what if we scale that?

07:51.000 --> 07:54.000
And what if we bring more people into that sort of process?

07:54.000 --> 07:55.000
And this is the potential.

07:55.000 --> 07:56.000
I'm bad with slides.

07:56.000 --> 07:59.000
And what I really want to happen here is like all these circles from the risk.

07:59.000 --> 08:00.000
Combined together.

08:00.000 --> 08:01.000
And then there's a big light.

08:01.000 --> 08:02.000
But no.

08:02.000 --> 08:03.000
Can't do that.

08:03.000 --> 08:05.000
So this is what we get.

08:05.000 --> 08:08.000
But if we bring in all these, let's go back to the risk side.

08:08.000 --> 08:15.000
Actually, if we bring in all these communities to be one entity, one organization, one community,

08:15.000 --> 08:21.000
then we can do so much more than like the use baby equipment being distributed to other people that need it.

08:21.000 --> 08:26.000
What if we talk to our local community members who are technology impacts every day.

08:26.000 --> 08:27.000
They're the core stakeholder.

08:27.000 --> 08:28.000
I know we hate that word.

08:28.000 --> 08:29.000
I hate that word.

08:29.000 --> 08:31.000
But they are the core stakeholder of everything we build.

08:31.000 --> 08:35.000
Whatever we build affects everyone in the world every day.

08:35.000 --> 08:36.000
So bring, go to them.

08:36.000 --> 08:37.000
Talk to them.

08:37.000 --> 08:38.000
There's no problem.

08:38.000 --> 08:43.000
Do you need help managing irrigation, managing water and farming equipment, that sort of thing?

08:43.000 --> 08:44.000
Okay.

08:44.000 --> 08:45.000
Great.

08:45.000 --> 08:51.000
Let's bring that problem and you, the person who thought of that problem, to the university in the local community,

08:51.000 --> 08:53.000
where we can research that problem.

08:53.000 --> 08:59.000
Does this problem exist elsewhere in other communities and other nations and other, anything?

08:59.000 --> 09:00.000
All right.

09:00.000 --> 09:01.000
Great.

09:01.000 --> 09:02.000
Let's develop a solution.

09:02.000 --> 09:04.000
Keep in the original community member with us.

09:04.000 --> 09:06.000
Let's go to maybe the design meet-up.

09:06.000 --> 09:07.000
Design community.

09:07.000 --> 09:08.000
Let's design a wireframe.

09:08.000 --> 09:09.000
Let's design an idea.

09:09.000 --> 09:12.000
Build out a roadmap for completing that idea.

09:12.000 --> 09:13.000
Wonderful.

09:13.000 --> 09:15.000
Let's keep everyone who's been in that process so far.

09:15.000 --> 09:17.000
Now go through sort of a development community.

09:17.000 --> 09:18.000
All right.

09:18.000 --> 09:19.000
Let's develop an MVP.

09:19.000 --> 09:21.000
Let's make it open source.

09:21.000 --> 09:22.000
All right.

09:22.000 --> 09:23.000
Great.

09:23.000 --> 09:25.000
Let's bring this to maybe the commercial community now.

09:25.000 --> 09:29.000
Is there a way to commercialize some aspect of this so that we can bring money back

09:29.000 --> 09:31.000
to sustain the open source aspect of it?

09:31.000 --> 09:32.000
Wonderful.

09:32.000 --> 09:33.000
If not.

09:33.000 --> 09:34.000
Okay.

09:34.000 --> 09:37.000
Let's bring it to the local government and implement some policy.

09:37.000 --> 09:41.000
Let's adopt this at a government level because it's core open source infrastructure.

09:41.000 --> 09:45.000
The university says, hey, these four other cities could probably use this solution as well.

09:45.000 --> 09:46.000
They'll help you maintain it.

09:46.000 --> 09:52.000
That was actually done in the South Coast, southeast and coast of the US with hurricane disaster relief.

09:52.000 --> 09:54.000
They needed some software to help manage.

09:54.000 --> 09:56.000
I don't know the specifics of it.

09:56.000 --> 10:03.000
We managed the responses to these disasters and it was developed by one city and then another city.

10:03.000 --> 10:08.000
By hurricane and they helped maintain it in development and they're just passing on the hurricane path.

10:08.000 --> 10:09.000
Really interesting story.

10:09.000 --> 10:11.000
I don't know much about.

10:11.000 --> 10:17.000
But great example of multiple cities working together to build and maintain open source software that impacts

10:17.000 --> 10:19.000
everyday local communities.

10:19.000 --> 10:22.000
So that's the potential of what we could build.

10:22.000 --> 10:30.000
If we brought in our definition of community to include everyone, not just development community.

10:30.000 --> 10:35.000
Local communities, universities, policy makers.

10:35.000 --> 10:40.000
If policy makers were in the room from the beginning when we're talking to the local community member who has a problem,

10:40.000 --> 10:44.000
we wouldn't have to get to the end of the process and then start explaining to the policy maker.

10:44.000 --> 10:46.000
Doesn't understand anything about anything we've done so far.

10:46.000 --> 10:47.000
Hey, this is important.

10:47.000 --> 10:48.000
We should implement this.

10:48.000 --> 10:53.000
They were there when the constituent said, I have a problem and they want to stay in power.

10:53.000 --> 10:56.000
They want to stay elected so they're going to do what the constituent wants.

10:56.000 --> 10:58.000
Makes life a little easier.

10:59.000 --> 11:02.000
So this brings us back and I'm going to have a lot of time for questions.

11:02.000 --> 11:04.000
So please think of something.

11:04.000 --> 11:09.000
This brings us back to that original problem that came up.

11:09.000 --> 11:13.000
The fraud problem.

11:13.000 --> 11:20.000
When we get in scam and the core demographic of the people getting taken advantage of being elderly people,

11:20.000 --> 11:22.000
people who don't necessarily interact with technology.

11:22.000 --> 11:25.000
And in Vermont, you're also incredibly rural.

11:25.000 --> 11:27.000
You live out in the country.

11:27.000 --> 11:31.000
You live in our biggest city is Burlington, which is a small town.

11:31.000 --> 11:32.000
It's beautiful.

11:32.000 --> 11:33.000
It should come.

11:33.000 --> 11:34.000
But it's tiny.

11:34.000 --> 11:36.000
So and most of the population does not live in Burlington.

11:36.000 --> 11:39.000
They live in many more smaller towns around the state.

11:39.000 --> 11:45.000
So is a conference going to help teach those people how not to get scammed?

11:45.000 --> 11:50.000
They're probably not going to leave their home or their local community to come to Burlington.

11:50.000 --> 11:56.000
The big city to listen to someone from the FBI talk about how not to get scammed.

11:56.000 --> 11:58.000
That's just not who they are.

11:58.000 --> 11:59.000
That doesn't speak their language.

11:59.000 --> 12:02.000
This idea is a conference idea is a great idea.

12:02.000 --> 12:06.000
But it didn't go out and speak to the local community first.

12:06.000 --> 12:08.000
Why are you getting scammed?

12:08.000 --> 12:10.000
Do you do these things?

12:10.000 --> 12:14.000
What's going on in your day-to-day life when you interact with technology on the internet?

12:15.000 --> 12:23.000
So the idea now is let's have the conference that teaches the teachers who then go out to the local community

12:23.000 --> 12:25.000
and have those conversations.

12:25.000 --> 12:26.000
Go to where they are.

12:26.000 --> 12:28.000
Go to the coffee shops, the bars.

12:28.000 --> 12:35.000
Have conversations, have round tables and town halls to talk to people about how they can be safer online

12:35.000 --> 12:36.000
and safer with technology.

12:36.000 --> 12:38.000
So they don't get scammed.

12:38.000 --> 12:48.000
So that's largely if we can abstract that fraud concepts to everything else that we build, what I'm advocating for.

12:48.000 --> 12:54.000
It's bringing the open source program office outside of the program office.

12:54.000 --> 12:58.000
Don't give it a definition as a program.

12:58.000 --> 13:01.000
Let it be what the local community needs it to be.

13:01.000 --> 13:03.000
And don't put it in an office.

13:03.000 --> 13:05.000
Put it in the coffee shop.

13:05.000 --> 13:06.000
Put it in the local community.

13:06.000 --> 13:11.000
Put it in the person's home or on their farm where they need solutions every day.

13:11.000 --> 13:19.000
And the great thing about Ospo, which is why I think they can the program office Ospo, which is why I think they can play such an important role in this,

13:19.000 --> 13:20.000
because they already exist.

13:20.000 --> 13:26.000
And they already exist in many cities, in many universities, in many institutions and corporations.

13:26.000 --> 13:30.000
And we can link them up into what might be a regional Ospo.

13:30.000 --> 13:34.000
There's that hurricane story going along the southern coast of the US.

13:34.000 --> 13:37.000
Although that technology I think died out.

13:37.000 --> 13:42.000
But if those cities linked up with their Ospo at the time, if they had them, I don't think they did.

13:42.000 --> 13:46.000
But they could keep that stuff going for longer.

13:46.000 --> 13:49.000
If we have UVM has a wonderful Ospo.

13:49.000 --> 13:56.000
I think there's corporations in the Northeast that have Ospo said well in other institutions.

13:56.000 --> 13:57.000
We're able to link all those up.

13:57.000 --> 14:02.000
Think about Maine, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, if you know they're in the Northeast.

14:02.000 --> 14:09.000
New York and a bunch of all those states working together to maintain open source software that affects all their local communities.

14:09.000 --> 14:14.000
And then also partnering with maybe the Pacific Northwest, which is also doing amazing work,

14:14.000 --> 14:20.000
experimenting with a sort of local community to policy pipeline of software development.

14:20.000 --> 14:23.000
And then maintaining software collaboratively that way.

14:23.000 --> 14:24.000
And I know there's a lot of stuff in Europe.

14:24.000 --> 14:33.000
There's actually a lot of organizations in Europe that are exploring different ways to bring local community into the development process.

14:33.000 --> 14:37.000
So if anyone knows about those or wants to tell me about them, I am all ears.

14:37.000 --> 14:40.000
But I'll end with a reframing of the Ospo.

14:40.000 --> 14:42.000
Maybe it's not a program office.

14:42.000 --> 14:46.000
Maybe it's just open source people and organizations working together.

14:46.000 --> 14:52.000
And I will say I take this idea of reframing Ospo from Jacob Green, who has like 6,000 of these Ospo.

14:52.000 --> 14:55.000
These Ospo redefinitions.

14:55.000 --> 14:57.000
And they're all fantastic.

14:57.000 --> 15:07.000
So is anyone not convinced that we should bring more people into open source development community?

15:07.000 --> 15:08.000
Great.

15:08.000 --> 15:09.000
Let's do it then.

15:10.000 --> 15:19.000
So I have, yeah, I've got 10 minutes for questions.

15:19.000 --> 15:25.000
I can talk about what we're doing in Vermont and a bunch of other stuff too.

15:25.000 --> 15:27.000
Shall I repeat it?

15:27.000 --> 15:28.000
I'll repeat it.

15:28.000 --> 15:30.000
Mr. Anderson.

15:30.000 --> 15:32.000
I want to be more in cooperation.

15:32.000 --> 15:34.000
And that's reading the trainer.

15:34.000 --> 15:35.000
Open source.

15:35.000 --> 15:36.000
We're working with the ship.

15:36.000 --> 15:38.000
We're doing something for the last month's year.

15:38.000 --> 15:40.000
We have been doing different level.

15:40.000 --> 15:43.000
And the struggle we have is to follow this.

15:43.000 --> 15:46.000
The software is not coming from communities.

15:46.000 --> 15:47.000
That was a times like that.

15:47.000 --> 15:51.000
It's a strength in the community for them to take over.

15:51.000 --> 15:54.000
And so you have an idea how to do this.

15:54.000 --> 15:58.000
Praise for those of you who are in relation to Ospo.

15:58.000 --> 16:04.000
That's very outside of Europe, on US, with more creating a void where you have

16:04.000 --> 16:05.000
to manage to keep people that you train.

16:05.000 --> 16:06.000
You need to train.

16:06.000 --> 16:07.000
You need to train.

16:07.000 --> 16:08.000
The developer also locally.

16:08.000 --> 16:09.000
Do you want them?

16:09.000 --> 16:11.000
Or not to leave this away?

16:11.000 --> 16:12.000
Yeah.

16:12.000 --> 16:13.000
That's a big question.

16:13.000 --> 16:19.000
So the question is how do you train, how do you bring someone through this process and have

16:19.000 --> 16:22.000
them stay in the community and help develop this software?

16:22.000 --> 16:24.000
I'm going to add something to it.

16:24.000 --> 16:29.000
And keep people from maybe taking advantage of mentorship programs where they go into

16:29.000 --> 16:30.000
Learn a skill to get a job.

16:30.000 --> 16:33.000
Which is not like a bad taking advantage of what it's built for.

16:33.000 --> 16:37.000
We want them to stay in these communities.

16:37.000 --> 16:44.000
I think, so one of the biggest benefits to this sort of community to policy pipeline is that you're

16:44.000 --> 16:49.000
trading, so an individual that goes through it is going to learn all this software stuff.

16:49.000 --> 16:51.000
It goes back to that fourth principle.

16:51.000 --> 16:57.000
You're learning how to learning these skills because you're an open source.

16:57.000 --> 17:02.000
But they're learning these skills on something, on building something that affects them personally.

17:03.000 --> 17:06.000
That is why I stay in open source.

17:06.000 --> 17:08.000
I'm building this kind of that first and second principle.

17:08.000 --> 17:11.000
I'll just build something that I want to use.

17:11.000 --> 17:17.000
So if we train people on something they want to use and don't necessarily look at them as a

17:17.000 --> 17:22.000
Commercial and product, like this person will either help me build a tool I can sell or be a consumer of the

17:22.000 --> 17:26.000
tool that I sell or the product, I think they're more likely to stay in.

17:26.000 --> 17:31.000
And the core aspect is get them to work on something, train them by having them work on something

17:31.000 --> 17:35.000
that affects them personally or someone in their family or their local community.

17:35.000 --> 17:37.000
So they stick around.

17:37.000 --> 17:41.000
They get to see the impact of it immediately.

17:41.000 --> 17:46.000
The answer to your question is a very broad question.

17:46.000 --> 17:47.000
Okay.

17:47.000 --> 17:49.000
Happy to.

17:49.000 --> 17:50.000
Any other thoughts?

17:50.000 --> 17:52.000
Does anyone yet go ahead?

17:52.000 --> 17:59.000
Do you think there are any inherent characteristics of the open source communities that make

17:59.000 --> 18:04.000
it difficult to collaborate or communicate with other parts of society?

18:04.000 --> 18:08.000
The deeper infrastructure for sure.

18:08.000 --> 18:09.000
Yeah.

18:09.000 --> 18:17.000
Are there some open source communities or development projects that are more difficult to integrate with local community?

18:17.000 --> 18:18.000
Yeah.

18:18.000 --> 18:19.000
For sure.

18:19.000 --> 18:21.000
The deeper infrastructure aspects.

18:21.000 --> 18:27.000
I'm not sure people should be learning how to contribute to open source on deep infrastructure.

18:27.000 --> 18:33.000
But they can learn on the application level, which is very impactful to an individual.

18:33.000 --> 18:35.000
And that's what the local community cares about.

18:35.000 --> 18:41.000
And one of the, another benefit of taking people through this community policy pipeline is that

18:41.000 --> 18:48.000
they're going to learn that, hey, my browser depends on a lot more than just this thing I double click on.

18:48.000 --> 18:50.000
There's more under it.

18:50.000 --> 18:55.000
And if they're interested, they can stay involved because they're working on an application that impacts

18:55.000 --> 18:59.000
them so they stay in the community and they go deeper and deeper deeper.

18:59.000 --> 19:04.000
And ultimately, we can get people contributing and supporting the deeper infrastructure.

19:04.000 --> 19:10.000
But yeah, maintaining programming languages, I don't think, is something we can bring to a local community.

19:10.000 --> 19:15.000
But people who maintain programming languages probably have local communities that they're a part of.

19:15.000 --> 19:16.000
This is another aspect.

19:16.000 --> 19:20.000
The remote aspect of technology work nowadays.

19:21.000 --> 19:24.000
Burlington Vermont is a great example of this.

19:24.000 --> 19:30.000
Vermont in general, there are a lot of remote workers up there who don't work for any companies that exist in that state.

19:30.000 --> 19:32.000
They don't go to an office, they don't do anything like that.

19:32.000 --> 19:35.000
They also don't necessarily interact with the community.

19:35.000 --> 19:40.000
So the community is being siloed from the tech community.

19:40.000 --> 19:43.000
And that's probably not something we want to see continue.

19:43.000 --> 19:46.000
We want to be part of our local communities.

19:46.000 --> 19:50.000
So it's more work and it's difficult work.

19:50.000 --> 19:54.000
And this is what we're starting to do in Vermont is organize organizers.

19:54.000 --> 19:58.000
But let's ourselves as the open source community.

19:58.000 --> 20:02.000
Even if we are working on the tech that the local communities might not appreciate or understand,

20:02.000 --> 20:07.000
let's go to the local community and ask them what they want us to work on.

20:07.000 --> 20:09.000
And we don't necessarily need to work on it.

20:09.000 --> 20:13.000
But we can help organize the rest of the remote community and say,

20:13.000 --> 20:17.000
here's something that Jim down the street asked for.

20:17.000 --> 20:18.000
It would help him a lot.

20:18.000 --> 20:19.000
Can we build it?

20:19.000 --> 20:22.000
And someone probably is going to have some spare time.

20:22.000 --> 20:23.000
They're a consultant or whatever.

20:23.000 --> 20:24.000
If you have time off, sure.

20:24.000 --> 20:25.000
I'll help build that thing.

20:25.000 --> 20:26.000
I'll start it.

20:26.000 --> 20:28.000
We'll make it open source or continue.

20:28.000 --> 20:32.000
And then bring that to other cities and other communities and see if we can grow it that way.

20:32.000 --> 20:38.000
So it's sort of a way, even though there are aspects of open source and technology that probably

20:38.000 --> 20:40.000
are not appreciated by local communities.

20:40.000 --> 20:45.000
It is a way to still engage them as individuals.

20:45.000 --> 20:47.000
It's a long answer.

20:47.000 --> 20:49.000
So for where are it?

20:49.000 --> 20:51.000
It's like, how did you get started?

20:51.000 --> 20:54.000
How do you get to attract people if you're going to speak to them?

20:54.000 --> 20:55.000
You're going to pack your tones.

20:55.000 --> 20:57.000
What has been working for you?

20:57.000 --> 21:01.000
So I moved to Berlin to three or four years ago before that.

21:01.000 --> 21:03.000
I was in Rochester, New York, which is very different.

21:03.000 --> 21:06.000
It's much larger in different communities, kind of world.

21:07.000 --> 21:10.000
Same type of people though, for sure.

21:10.000 --> 21:12.000
And so that was right after the pandemic.

21:12.000 --> 21:15.000
And I've been told that before the pandemic and I very much believe this.

21:15.000 --> 21:19.000
The technology community in Vermont was very united.

21:19.000 --> 21:20.000
It was very cohesive.

21:20.000 --> 21:22.000
And like so many other things.

21:22.000 --> 21:24.000
The pandemic kind of blew that apart.

21:24.000 --> 21:26.000
So and it hasn't come back together yet.

21:26.000 --> 21:32.000
So what we just started doing is, you know, we have half a dozen meetups in Berlin to

21:32.000 --> 21:33.000
themselves.

21:33.000 --> 21:35.000
We have an entire corporation of meetups.

21:35.000 --> 21:39.000
We have the user testing and the product managers, the design meetup, the development

21:39.000 --> 21:40.000
meetup, the data science meetup.

21:40.000 --> 21:42.000
Just like you guys are, it's not.

21:42.000 --> 21:44.000
No one had the capacity.

21:44.000 --> 21:49.000
No one organizer of each of those meetups had the capacity to organize something once a month

21:49.000 --> 21:50.000
regularly.

21:50.000 --> 21:52.000
So we said, let's stop organizing separate stuff.

21:52.000 --> 21:59.000
And let's make a group of organizers that can support one another to build one singular

21:59.000 --> 22:04.000
up that can then also branch off into support for niches, more niches.

22:04.000 --> 22:09.000
And the thinking there is also that as a more cohesive group, we can get support easier.

22:09.000 --> 22:15.000
Instead of the data science meetup which is 15 people going to a local company and saying

22:15.000 --> 22:20.000
hey can you buy his pizza, it's a large group of a couple hundred people saying hey can your

22:20.000 --> 22:23.000
name is going to get in front of a couple hundred people can you buy his pizza.

22:23.000 --> 22:25.000
And we're hoping that will happen.

22:25.000 --> 22:26.000
Because we did just start doing this.

22:26.000 --> 22:33.000
So what we did, the quick answer to this is we connected all the organizers into one group of

22:33.000 --> 22:36.000
organizers and we're continuously inviting more people to come organize.

22:36.000 --> 22:39.000
Some of us have a lot of experience in organizing, some of us are just getting into it.

22:39.000 --> 22:41.000
So we're also teaching people to organize.

22:41.000 --> 22:45.000
Which is something that I separate from all of this, something that gets critical for open source

22:45.000 --> 22:46.000
but even more organizers.

22:46.000 --> 22:49.000
But that's expanding from there.

22:49.000 --> 22:50.000
So it's meetups.

22:50.000 --> 22:55.000
We want to grow into hackathons and we want to start inviting the local community into these sort of

22:55.000 --> 22:56.000
conversations.

22:56.000 --> 22:58.000
Our first meetup was fantastic.

22:58.000 --> 23:04.000
It was at UVM which is literally an institution on a hill in a classroom that it feels

23:04.000 --> 23:08.000
very disconnected from local communities and it was a bunch of brilliant tech community

23:08.000 --> 23:10.000
people that are talking about amazing things.

23:10.000 --> 23:13.000
But there is no one from the local community there.

23:13.000 --> 23:18.000
There needs to be meetups and hackathons.

23:19.000 --> 23:24.000
Can you see how to brush them up and move up intermediate to the new episodes that

23:24.000 --> 23:28.000
meet them now and they can have like only half of the time with them.

23:28.000 --> 23:30.000
And that's possible.

23:30.000 --> 23:35.000
The other way is that they'll help remind the people that it's community reports.

23:35.000 --> 23:36.000
Yeah.

23:36.000 --> 23:37.000
And I apologize.

23:37.000 --> 23:39.000
I didn't repeat that question, which is how do we start this?

23:39.000 --> 23:44.000
And this question is have I seen a project grow up so big that it becomes self-sustaining

23:44.000 --> 23:45.000
essentially?

23:45.000 --> 23:58.000
I don't think they're making nothing comes to mind where they reach that end state.

23:58.000 --> 24:06.000
But there is a project out of the Portland and not main Oregon which is Northwest

24:06.000 --> 24:11.000
US where they created software that helps.

24:11.000 --> 24:13.000
I'm going to use some of the wrong words here so forgive me.

24:13.000 --> 24:14.000
But someone goes to jail.

24:14.000 --> 24:16.000
They get a stain on the record that they've been in jail.

24:16.000 --> 24:19.000
And when you get out of jail, it makes it really difficult to get a job.

24:19.000 --> 24:23.000
And in order to get that thing sort of removed from your record, you have to go through a process

24:23.000 --> 24:26.000
which can take a lot of time and money and it's prohibitive.

24:26.000 --> 24:29.000
So you don't have a job, you don't have time and money.

24:29.000 --> 24:33.000
You have to now spend time and money to get this thing removed so you can get a job.

24:33.000 --> 24:35.000
It's kind of mad.

24:35.000 --> 24:40.000
So what this group did is they created open software that now cost $50 instead of like $500

24:40.000 --> 24:44.000
or $1,000 to get this thing removed from your record so you can go into jail.

24:44.000 --> 24:46.000
And that has been incredibly successful.

24:46.000 --> 24:51.000
And the local government in the Northwest looks at it and appreciates it.

24:51.000 --> 24:58.000
They're also working on digital identity for just people, always open source software, just fantastic.

24:58.000 --> 25:00.000
I forget what the group is called.

25:00.000 --> 25:04.000
But his name is Hugh and he's out of the Pacific Northwest and check it out.

25:04.000 --> 25:05.000
He does great work.

