WEBVTT 00:00.000 --> 00:18.000 It's 1215 and we have a special slot that we intended for exchanges with our audience, that's you. 00:18.000 --> 00:27.000 So we will do a five minute presentation of the team really quick, maybe not even a roundtable. 00:27.000 --> 00:30.000 I don't even know how we're going to do this. 00:30.000 --> 00:43.000 We have five minutes where we want to ask you if you want to join us, just a very important part of this slot is us asking you to come to the open research forum. 00:43.000 --> 00:47.000 And then a moment for question. 00:48.000 --> 00:51.000 Do we, do we share the mic? Do I present you? 00:51.000 --> 00:55.000 Do we, how do we do this? My name is Diego. 00:55.000 --> 01:02.000 I am a research engineering in Switzerland right now in the University of Nishatel. 01:02.000 --> 01:09.000 It's been, I think, more than five years I am in the devroom organizing team. 01:09.000 --> 01:12.000 It started with Paul and Mathew. 01:12.000 --> 01:16.000 So I guess I should pass you the mic. 01:16.000 --> 01:25.000 Thanks man. Hi everyone. I'm a researcher. I'm in Copenhagen right now and I used to be a research engineer and where I've been doing making some software. 01:25.000 --> 01:36.000 I work in social science. I think something that might be relevant to mention is in which context in which kind of fields we work on because we try to cover. 01:36.000 --> 01:45.000 I mean, the extent of science and also in this devroom extending to journalism activism to some extent. 01:45.000 --> 01:57.000 Because we tend to use the same kind of tools if you have tool that works for sociology, it's probably works for journalists as well. So we pull that. 01:58.000 --> 02:06.000 All right. Hi everyone. So I'm Paul. So I've been a research engineer in social sciences for a long time. 02:06.000 --> 02:14.000 But then I switched and I actually have my own company. So I also represent here research engineers that are subcontractors. 02:14.000 --> 02:21.000 Let's say building software as far research teams from outside of academia which also works. 02:21.000 --> 02:23.000 And yeah, that's me. 02:23.000 --> 02:24.000 Jim. 02:27.000 --> 02:34.000 Thanks. Yes. I'm Jim Edge. I'm a research software engineer from the UK. 02:34.000 --> 02:42.000 I've been helping this room for two years and it's my third full stem. So the first year I spoke in stream. 02:42.000 --> 02:47.000 And I think I'm a bit an example of what the takers saying earlier. 02:47.000 --> 02:54.000 I was speaking about a project I'm involved in called the Cheering Way, which is sort of a research project. 02:54.000 --> 03:04.000 But not really. It's like a collaboratively written guide that's a reproducible ethical collaborative data science. 03:04.000 --> 03:09.000 Yeah, that's something I spent quite a bit of time on now. 03:09.000 --> 03:15.000 Yeah, that's it. Isn't it? That was the next. 03:15.000 --> 03:19.000 Hi everyone. I'm Victor. 03:19.000 --> 03:28.000 I was remember just being in the room the first time we did open research in 2020. 03:28.000 --> 03:33.000 I used to be a researcher in physics. Now I do data science in drug discovery. 03:33.000 --> 03:41.000 And I've been part of a committee for the last two years, I think, two or three time flies. 03:41.000 --> 03:52.000 And it's to me it's an anchor into open research in open source technologies, which are not completely core part of my job now. 03:52.000 --> 03:58.000 So it's still happy to contribute that way. 03:58.000 --> 04:05.000 Yeah, go for it, maybe. 04:06.000 --> 04:15.000 Hi, how are you? I'm Violeta. I'm a computer vision research software engineer at the University of Surrey in the UK. 04:15.000 --> 04:25.000 And I do things with 3D reconstruction, novel views, indices, matching learning models, deep learning. 04:25.000 --> 04:35.000 Yeah, I've been involved with reproducibility, open research at Surrey, and just wait for us them for many years. 04:35.000 --> 04:39.000 Who is next? Yes, maybe I'm last. 04:39.000 --> 04:46.000 Emiliano, so a researcher in the computational social stance in Paris, so in the source of Paris. 04:46.000 --> 04:54.000 I took here twice, I give a hand when I can, and I learn every day every year and stuff here. 04:54.000 --> 05:00.000 So it's a place where I increase my investment in an open source software. 05:00.000 --> 05:03.000 Yeah, one bit of the other. 05:03.000 --> 05:07.000 I have to mention that there are more people here. 05:07.000 --> 05:15.000 Yeah, okay, most importantly, so the committee is not perfectly gender balance, but we have also, like, most women in the committee. 05:15.000 --> 05:23.000 In the committee could not be there, and it's a kind of a coincidence, aside from having babies, which is also part of the, of the game. 05:23.000 --> 05:35.000 But it's always difficult, as you know, to have women, and I would say, not so difficult to have them in the, in the committee, but to have them proposed talks. 05:36.000 --> 05:43.000 So in the talks we select, it's not so bad, but in the talks we receive, it's extremely skewed. 05:43.000 --> 05:50.000 And one of the ways to get out of this is not only to have women presenting talks, but also being involved in the committee and so on. 05:50.000 --> 05:56.000 Because part of the job is also to publicize the devroom, so that is the way to do it and so on. 05:56.000 --> 06:03.000 So it's always, well, would you consider joining us? Would you consider joining the devroom? 06:03.000 --> 06:09.000 Because one of the, the work is not so bad because we are so many. 06:09.000 --> 06:15.000 But the thing is, every time we publicize, you try to enrich new people, we have kind of exhausted after seven years. 06:15.000 --> 06:22.000 Our social networks and fresh new blood helps extend the profile and shape the devroom on someone. 06:22.000 --> 06:29.000 It's not that much work. We are enough to review everything and someone multiple times. 06:29.000 --> 06:31.000 So that's, that's our call. 06:31.000 --> 06:37.000 Should I mention each and every single person, maybe, so we have a, just by name, I want to mention, 06:37.000 --> 06:44.000 Any steal, she was stuck in the UK for visa questions, which was a many occasions, occurrences of this year. 06:44.000 --> 06:48.000 Celia question Daniel could not come, she's been with us for a while. 06:48.000 --> 06:55.000 Deborah, I think Deborah Udo is here in the first name, but she didn't. 06:55.000 --> 07:01.000 And Sarah, just had babies, but Sarah will, 07:01.000 --> 07:06.000 Exactly. She will be with us soon, we hope. 07:06.000 --> 07:11.000 And we also have a yo Yehudi who is on and off, depending on how, whether she can come or not. 07:11.000 --> 07:15.000 She's often, she was used to be more online during the Covid times. 07:16.000 --> 07:20.000 We just had one year before the Covid. They said the devroom is seven years old. 07:20.000 --> 07:28.000 And another thing I would like to mention is another bias we have is we tend to be more on the social science side. 07:28.000 --> 07:35.000 But so we take, we would like to have more people involved in the community in the natural science side. 07:35.000 --> 07:40.000 It would help attract different kinds of talks, just a relevant. 07:40.000 --> 07:44.000 The devroom was initially created by two different teams that were good match together. 07:44.000 --> 07:48.000 But ultimately we landed on the social science side. 07:48.000 --> 07:51.000 But Achilles is here somewhere in the first name. 07:51.000 --> 07:52.000 Yep. 07:52.000 --> 07:56.000 The original founder of this devroom of Neurosciences. 07:56.000 --> 07:59.000 We broke the project about time. 07:59.000 --> 08:01.000 Look. 08:01.000 --> 08:03.000 We're ending this. 08:03.000 --> 08:10.000 Go ahead. 08:10.000 --> 08:17.000 So where is the scope of the open research devroom? 08:17.000 --> 08:21.000 We do have a website. 08:21.000 --> 08:24.000 Yes. 08:24.000 --> 08:27.000 That's the scope. 08:27.000 --> 08:30.000 Is the scope explained in this version of the website? 08:30.000 --> 08:34.000 Yes. 08:34.000 --> 08:35.000 No. 08:35.000 --> 08:40.000 This is good. 08:40.000 --> 08:41.000 Yeah. 08:41.000 --> 08:46.000 But you can read that but in short. 08:46.000 --> 08:51.000 So two science, which in this, the context of the first name means open source. 08:51.000 --> 08:53.000 First of all, open source. 08:53.000 --> 08:56.000 If you're not open source, you can't present to the first name. 08:56.000 --> 08:58.000 The devroom. 08:58.000 --> 09:01.000 Tools for science. 09:01.000 --> 09:03.000 And this made me mean different things. 09:03.000 --> 09:06.000 So you will see in this devroom, the bunch of tools. 09:06.000 --> 09:11.000 All discussions about technology, open source technologies. 09:11.000 --> 09:13.000 And the questions linked to technology. 09:13.000 --> 09:16.000 So could be discussions about openness and so on. 09:16.000 --> 09:22.000 And as I said before, so science is whatever is scientific, so from any field. 09:22.000 --> 09:29.000 But also extended to other kinds of non-scientific fields who would work with knowledge. 09:29.000 --> 09:32.000 And in particular, journalism. 09:32.000 --> 09:38.000 Open source intelligence would qualify some form of activism. 09:38.000 --> 09:42.000 Open hardware also qualifies. 09:42.000 --> 09:47.000 But in a scientific or no-latch production context. 09:47.000 --> 09:51.000 No-latch production is what I was about to say. 09:51.000 --> 09:57.000 Open source intelligence. 09:57.000 --> 10:06.000 And sometimes it's a bit of a discussion within ourselves when we review abstracts. 10:06.000 --> 10:07.000 All right. 10:07.000 --> 10:09.000 So yeah, open researchers. 10:09.000 --> 10:14.000 Sometimes it's really easy to see the link when we have abstracts. 10:14.000 --> 10:18.000 It's obvious or it's obvious to part of a committee. 10:18.000 --> 10:23.000 But we want to cover a really wide range of topics. 10:23.000 --> 10:29.000 Meaning that sometimes the link might not be obvious to at least part of the people. 10:29.000 --> 10:37.000 Or that to say that if you're passionate about a topic you think is open research. 10:37.000 --> 10:41.000 Join us, come talk to us, advocate. 10:42.000 --> 10:47.000 We want to have large topics, but we have limits in our knowledge. 10:47.000 --> 10:52.000 And that's also one way to contribute. 10:52.000 --> 10:55.000 I want to add the description. 10:55.000 --> 11:00.000 We've just presented as a proposal that we make to the presenters. 11:00.000 --> 11:05.000 But the first way the devroom is shaped is by the proposals we receive. 11:05.000 --> 11:07.000 So for example, some years. 11:07.000 --> 11:12.000 We had a lot of things about the reproducibility crisis. 11:12.000 --> 11:13.000 And then we'd be a lot about that. 11:13.000 --> 11:16.000 And then it kind of stopped and then comes back a little bit. 11:16.000 --> 11:17.000 It could be a one year. 11:17.000 --> 11:19.000 It's a lot of fair principles to things. 11:19.000 --> 11:21.000 This did not come from us. 11:21.000 --> 11:23.000 It came from you guys. 11:23.000 --> 11:25.000 So proposals shaped it. 11:25.000 --> 11:27.000 And then the committee. 11:27.000 --> 11:29.000 So whoever is in the committee also shapes it. 11:29.000 --> 11:32.000 So which means that if you're in and you want to change that every year. 11:32.000 --> 11:34.000 We wonder if we will change it and adapt it. 11:34.000 --> 11:37.000 Every year we move a few things. 11:37.000 --> 11:42.000 So everything is up for discussion and reconfiguration. 11:42.000 --> 11:44.000 But you just have to step in. 11:44.000 --> 11:46.000 Nothing is locked in. 11:46.000 --> 11:51.000 We have former members of the room that come to visit. 11:51.000 --> 11:52.000 That's really cool. 11:52.000 --> 11:54.000 They try to hide in the very big. 11:54.000 --> 11:55.000 Exactly. 11:55.000 --> 11:56.000 Very discreet. 11:56.000 --> 11:59.000 You don't have to die in the devroom. 11:59.000 --> 12:00.000 You can leave it. 12:00.000 --> 12:01.000 Yes. 12:01.000 --> 12:03.000 No, that's also really important. 12:03.000 --> 12:06.000 You can come in and come out whenever you want participating. 12:06.000 --> 12:08.000 It's not a lucky process. 12:08.000 --> 12:11.000 We are really flexible in our way of organizing. 12:11.000 --> 12:13.000 And it has been said. 12:13.000 --> 12:15.000 I think it's not a lot of work. 12:15.000 --> 12:17.000 We are a cool team now. 12:17.000 --> 12:20.000 Almost ten members more or less depending on the year. 12:20.000 --> 12:21.000 It's been five years. 12:21.000 --> 12:22.000 So the process is. 12:22.000 --> 12:24.000 Let's say streamlined. 12:24.000 --> 12:25.000 And it works. 12:25.000 --> 12:26.000 Just works. 12:26.000 --> 12:29.000 There is space for welcoming new members. 12:29.000 --> 12:32.000 And that's what the slot is about. 12:32.000 --> 12:34.000 So yeah, exactly. 12:34.000 --> 12:35.000 Do reach out. 12:35.000 --> 12:37.000 Well, time is it. 12:37.000 --> 12:39.000 Almost. 12:39.000 --> 12:40.000 Are there questions? 12:40.000 --> 12:41.000 No? 12:41.000 --> 12:42.000 Questions. 12:42.000 --> 12:43.000 Yeah. 12:43.000 --> 12:44.000 I don't know. 12:44.000 --> 12:45.000 Down it. 12:45.000 --> 12:47.000 The user. 12:47.000 --> 12:49.000 You're a little more independent. 12:49.000 --> 12:51.000 Microsoft is already. 12:51.000 --> 12:54.000 You probably have to try and succeed. 12:54.000 --> 12:55.000 I agree with GV. 12:55.000 --> 12:58.000 If you've done that as network sales. 12:59.000 --> 13:04.000 So I think some of us discovered this through the graph. 13:04.000 --> 13:06.000 The room that we should no longer exist. 13:06.000 --> 13:09.000 So a little bit of that. 13:09.000 --> 13:11.000 We can't cover. 13:11.000 --> 13:12.000 Yes. 13:12.000 --> 13:14.000 We also have people in research court. 13:14.000 --> 13:16.000 So I work with. 13:16.000 --> 13:19.000 Absolutely. 13:19.000 --> 13:23.000 The question is, do we have members of the research support. 13:24.000 --> 13:27.000 Yeah, we do welcome. 13:27.000 --> 13:32.000 Well, we discussed about, I don't know, funding to research support 13:32.000 --> 13:33.000 in terms of communication. 13:33.000 --> 13:34.000 Can be also science. 13:34.000 --> 13:37.000 I think none of us have worked specifically in that field. 13:37.000 --> 13:41.000 As I understand it, we had books from the field before a few. 13:41.000 --> 13:43.000 So that would be a welcome addition. 13:43.000 --> 13:44.000 Yeah. 13:44.000 --> 13:45.000 Definitely. 13:45.000 --> 13:48.000 Thanks for the question. 13:48.000 --> 13:50.000 You welcome. 13:50.000 --> 13:51.000 Hey. 13:52.000 --> 13:53.000 We should wrap up. 13:53.000 --> 13:54.000 Yes. 13:54.000 --> 13:55.000 I mean, it's time for the next talk. 13:55.000 --> 13:56.000 Thank you guys. 13:56.000 --> 13:57.000 Who's next? 13:57.000 --> 13:58.000 Thanks. 13:58.000 --> 14:00.000 What's next anyway.