=====
From evilsnack@hotmail.com:
It's just a bunch of morphing.  Not terribly interesting.


=====
From jps6860@yahoo.com:
An interesting idea, but artistically it is a bit boring.  I would have been 
nice to have a few other elements in the scene to give each evolution some 
context.  Even an image map in the background that faded into the next image 
would have been something to look at other than plain white.  The framing
of the last two objects (skyscraper and rocket) are a bit off.  The columns
and chimney are framed so they fill the frame from top to bottom.  For the
last two the tops stay touching the top of the frame but their bottoms stay
at the middle of the frame.

=====
From irtc_mail@yahoo.co.uk:

 A good idea to show the evolution of architecture, but I don't
 think the structures you have chosen quite fit the idea. Did
 chimneys evolve into skyscrapers? Did rockets evolve from
 skyscrapers?

 Perhaps morphing is not the best way of showing changes in
 buildings. Would a time-lapse style deconstruction/construction
 effect fit in better with the theme.

 The frames seem very large with only a small part of the image
 having anything on it. Having white objects against a white
 background is not very clear.

 I'm not sure what happens to the rocket at the end. It looks 
 like it launches, then falls over and comes back down again.
 


=====
From file:
I like it.  Nice interpretation of the subject.  Something for the background would have been an improvement, but the clean look works.