===== Well it's close but I think it fits flight (just barely) nice image, the darkness does make for a dramatic theme. ===== Lots of potential here dude. You could have had a fine piece with a little background. ===== it miss some cloud .. or stars ..! ===== Yes I do like the effect. Try soing a fly-by animation of this - should look amazing ===== Nnnnnnice. I like it, and I agree with your choice to make it a night scene. Well done. ===== I am always impressed by using hand-coded models (procedural or otherwise). You're right, radiosity adds a lot to the effect. Low originality due to source of idea. ===== Your image is excellent, but would have fit better into sci-fi rather than flight. Orbit and hover do not mean the same thing as flight. ===== Camera angle is a little dull. How about getting in a little closer to the subject? ===== I like detail, and this has plenty, and I like the idea of a program that adds detail automatically :). The lighting is nice, but somehow the picture lacks something. I think daylight would have been better than night. These objects might be artifacts in a museum case. There is no context provided for them. ===== Excellent use of procedural modelling techniques (all that C++ code) you should try Renderman(TM). A better sense of altitude might have been given if a more representative background could have been included. Did you try a sunset image? ===== This scene just BEGS for some stars in the background. ===== I cannot deny a fellow StarWars fan! ===== Good originality. I've seen several Star Wars images, but this is the first "original" Star Wars one I've seen. It is also the only one that I can be sure was created from scratch. (Some of the images could have been created by importing an X-Wing. Not that I disapprove of importing models. On the contrary, if sufficient models already exist, a true artist would be foolish to create his own from scratch. But I do believe that creating ones own model adds a great deal to the merit of the work. ===== Put Bespin below it. ===== Star Wars!!!! That was last month. ===== Nice rendition of the image. Well built objects ===== DRAWING TO DARK TO NOTICE DETAILS CONCEPT INTERESTING ===== very nice image. the best so far since i have been rating the images. the only thing I am takin off points for is originality. Mcquarrie's work is original, copying him isn't ===== I'll be using this in my Star Wars campaign... ===== Not realy flight in my books, as much as it is a sky city. ===== Another one who missed the SF round, eh? Not bad, but nothing outstanding. I liked the rich color on the floating platform, but it could have used more detail--the lights look like stuck-on decals. ===== Quite good! But it's a pity you had to turn off the star field...