=====
From cyber.mage@mailexcite.com:
Nice figures, but sick idea!

=====
From agage@mines.edu:
I knew there would be at least one of these this round...

A bit tasteless, I have to say, at least for a public competition.


=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Scored you low on concept.  Perhaps full view of genatalia would have been
tolerated had your work had a more clear message of some sort about sexual
practice.  But the vagueness and silly pun make it seem merely pornographic. 
=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
I'm not offended! Thanks for a bit of fun! Don't take seriously other posibly
bad comments...

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
Jag gillar iden, och modellerna ar ganska valgjorda, men Profilpaketet ser
valdigt
stort ut...

=====
From jjanger@mail.cspp.edu:
   You seriously submitted this? I admire your courage. You got all 1's from
me, but I admire your courage.

=====
From sanna@censa3.polito.it:
An "interesting" interpretation of theme
=====
From kefriber@online.no:
We scandinavians DO rock - right ? *lol* 
(Men den der profil-pakken s_ 'litt' stor ut - eller ?) ;-)
As you can see from my vote you've scored MAX on the originality,
but I've moderated my voting on the artistic/technical due
to the simplicity of the surroundings, and the sheet looks kinda weird...
You got me laughing though,,,,cewl - keep on rockin !

=====
From dormammu@erols.com:
The humans look waaaay too stiff and unreal.  More background would've been 
better.  (ie, night stand, table, lamp, whatever.)
=====
From karl@pemail.net:
Looks like the revenge of the blow-up dolls.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Words fail us!

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Certain areas of the image seem strangely blurry -- why?
No shadows.  Looks like a scanline, not raytraced.

=====
From djconnel@flash.net:
Uhhhh....

The guy looks like an inflatable dummy.
The sheets could use some work..
The female is nicely modelled.
The concept is a matter of taste -- it is on topic,
  but there's nothing really special about it.

The "AIDS" message seems like a weak attempt
to avoid offending people.



=====
From cfusner@enter.net:
Must have been quite a night. From the positioning and facial expression
it looks like she killed him.


=====
From r@client876c.globalnet.co.uk:
Sadly not even erotic.


=====
From r@207.232.193.166:
You perv.  This contest should never have even allowed this entrant.  (Kinda
interesting, though)
Notable for modelling, lighting


=====
From r@du206-1.ppp.algonet.se:
Message from author:


=====
From r@du206-1.ppp.algonet.se:
Message from author:       I must say I can_t really understand the fuzz about
this picture... You don_t see any intime body-parts! And I thought that we all
are so familiar with AIDS that we could joke about it... Jesus, they_re even
using condoms! (Look at the condoms package beside them...) This could by all
means be a picture for an Anti-Aids-campaign!!! I know that I will get deducts
for this, and perhaps my other picture will suffer as well, but I don_t care!!!
This is a competition mainly for POV-users, and this has become very clear for
me... 


=====
From r@dial-up30.webbernet.net:
A nice model with a lame background is a mistake.  When you establish a certain
level of detail in one part of the pic, you need to maintain it.  Making the
man hairless was a bit of a copout.  Marginal for topic.  Your human
proportions are better here than in your other image.  The shoulders don't
connect quite right.  Your modelling shows promise.  If you learn to think a
bit more about composition and a bit less about sexual frustration, you have
considerable potential.  This comment by clem@dhol.com.