=====
From sshaw@fas.harvard.edu:
The plants are well done.  The transparent cones that you used to make the 'fur' is very effective.  The plants are all well done.  For the connection to the topic, I understand the idea that you had here but looking at the scene I just don't get the feeling of looking at ruins.  Though it might be less true to reality, having more of the ruins in tact might have helped me there.

=====
From sammy@cube.net:
extremely good 1st entry!!!!! I wish you the 2nd place! (sorry, 
but The one with the skulls is my favourite!:)

=====
From Martin.Magnusson.7121@student.uu.se:
The fur and moss are excellent! Good modelling overall, but I can't figure out
what the red stuff at the left is.

=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
That moss is pretty incredible! So is the fur, I'm going to have to remember those techniques.
=====
From jull43@ij.net:
I can't see any glyphs. I see a couple of straight sides. 
Broken cut stones. But is that history is is that today? 

I see ferns growing out of what appears to be water. I was 
unaware they were aquatic plants. I think I am seeiing 
bright read soil on the "banks" of the water. 


=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
Very good image; although the connection with the topic is not immediately
visible, it becomes very clear after reading the text and some closer looks.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Great first effort!  Good techniques all over, but the final scene is rather murky.  Its significance isn't obvious until you read the text file.  Good soft lighting and shadows.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Very atmospheric. A nice image.

=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
Very coherent composition; a little confusing at first 
sight, but once you
enter the image, it becomes familiar.

=====
From bobfranke@halcyon.com:
Very nice first entry.  Howeve,r I would like to see more 
focus on the ancient relics and less on the plant life.  I 
am looking forward to your next entry.