=====
From sshaw@fas.harvard.edu:
I like your idea for the personal history, but in its execution it became a bit sparse.  I can't tell so much on the walls, but the color and texture used on the ceiling looks really good.

=====
From kosh@nesys.com:
Yike!
This raises the spectre of recursive rendering!
Q: Would the render time go to infinity?


=====
From jerry@hoboes.com:
Cool idea! Your simple leaflet works pretty well as is. I remember your image from the water round, and I'd say this is definitely an improvement in both style and technique!

I would like to see you hurt more bears, though.
=====
From klynn@uswest.net:
Clever idea.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Really liked it. 
=====
From jull43@ij.net:
A nice image but as I don't see anything related to the 
topic. Therefore I scored as low as possible to keep it 
from effecting those who are at least on topic. If this is 
supposed to be the history of your entries, you say this is 
your 12th but there are 12 in the image. If the nasty one 
had been this one, maybe. 

I just do not see history in this one. 

=====
From bsieker@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de:
I like this one ...
I was not too fond of some of your earlier images, but this one is somehow a
lot better. The idea is nice and also this time the lighting is ok, and there
is not "water that does not at all look like water" or so ...
A higher JPEG quality setting could have done a lot to improve the image, some
artifacts are too clearly visible.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Hah!  Brilliant.

=====
From ethelm@bigfoot.com:
Pretty interesting way of showing the History topic and 
tells a story at the same time.

=====
From 101741.541@compuserve.com:
Egotic concept !


=====
From r@pluto.icom-solutions.com:
Notable for originality


=====
From r@98cab144.ipt.aol.com:
Funny! Cute, too. I like it
Notable for originality, composition