=====
From ekaiser@camden.tds.net:
cool. Needs zestier colors

=====
From whhale@nvl.army.mil:
Same complaint i've had about the others...all is too clean...needs erosion

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:

Nice work... the textures and lighting work well together.
=====
From taymac@peaknet.net:
great composition and depth of field. eccellent detail on most of the structure, 
needs a more aged and crumbled effect in the close up areas of the foregroung

=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
A bit dull and grey, but pretty good.
It indeed looks like a lot of work.

=====
From jouni@mikrobitti.fi:
A somewhat classic interpretation of ruins, with some nice twists 
thrown in. I like especially the plant in the foreground. Overall, 
a very nice proof of your modeling abilities (although I could swear 
there's a brick with nothing below it on the right wall, at about 
pixel position 775, 60). Good work!

=====
From jrcsurvey@aol.com:
Nice compositional effect with the shadows.  Beautiful rich blacks.

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
I like the use of nuclear radiation symbols and the plant 
sprig lying on the ground.  The textures are good, and it 
really gives a sense of a building that is in the process 
of falling down.

=====
From jaime@ctav.es:
Hard work! Strange lighting, but adds some mistery...

=====
From clem@dhol.org:
Good modelling and textures.  I like the fallen rail and 
raised flagstone, the hint of moss on the rocks and, 
especially, the vagrant weed.  It seems to me that the 
fallen brcks should show evidence of chipping and 
weathering and there should be more dirt.  Good job.

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
Nice blocks! Modelling and object positioning is impressive. This is
technically and thematically very good, but seems a little too stark and
monochrome to really make an artistic impact. The holly helps, but I think
this needs something more - perhaps brighter light, filtering out of a
coloured sky, and maybe an angled view of the wall with something else -
a tree or something - showing past the end.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
Looks good, but wouldn't some of theose blocks be chipped, and where the ground
has fallen away the wall would be all cracked and falling down directly above it.
This is a good effort, well lit, and well arranged in general.