=====
From bfranke2@home.com:
A bit to abstract for me.

=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
Nice colors. Leaves could look more realistic. Very Artsy.


=====
From harlidobib@redshift.com:
Interesting... :)

=====
From javaearl@hotmail.com:
Very interesting concept...the view is almost bug-like (pretty neat.) Like the
crystalline leaf structures; they really add to the effect.

=====
From warp@iki.fi:
The connection with the topic seems very vague. Works as abstract art, so no
1 as 'interpretation of theme', but low anyways. Technically not anything
amazing. Low score, sorry.

=====
From dmacisaacj@hotmail.com:
hmmmmmmm...

=====
From nitschk@ranke.be.schule.de:
A little bit too abstract!

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Very abstract, but I like it, original interpreteion, good light work

=====
From jouni@mikrobitti.fi:
Too abstract to me, even though you gave a good explanation of it. ;-)

=====
From mar@physics.usyd.edu.au:
I like this. Artistically very interesting - the abstract feel does in
a way capture the feel of wilderness. Definitely good marks for concept
and originality. I would like to see more images like this in the
competition rather than photo-realistic after photo-realistic scene.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Artistic - I guess if one is a fan of abstract art this would be appealing
Technical - Nothing too complicated here
Concept - No my idea of a wilderness


=====
From file:
I really like this one, it reminds me of the style of painting that the cubists
did.