=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
Image looks good. Love the grass. Reminds me of the American Mid West.



=====
From harlidobib@redshift.com:
Simple yet beautiful.

=====
From warp@iki.fi:
Using tools in the right way for creating a good image has some technical
merit indeed, but since almost everything is just automatically generated
with just a couple of parameters set by you, I can't give a high technical
score. If you had modelled some complex object (a bird or whatever) with
povray or other programs (like spatch), it would have been different.
Some animals wouldn't have hurt the image after all...

=====
From dmacisaacj@hotmail.com:
I like it.  Very realistic.  Could be a bad storm in them thar clouds.  Good work...

=====
From dearmad@sapere.com:

a lion hidden in there would have livened it up
=====
From mark.wagner17@gte.net:
You might want to do something like randomly rotating 
the patches of grass to get rid of the regularity in the 
grass positioning.

=====
From chris_hormann@gmx.de:
Nice sample for Gilles Tran's macros, the tree could have a bit more
irregularity, you could have used some random factor for grass placement, IMO
it looks somewhat like a man-seeded grass - not "wild" enough :-)

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
The grass looks very nice, and the sky, while simple, is 
very effective and suits the scene well.  The tree looks 
nice, but could use some more leaves on the side facing 
the camera, perhaps?  Overall, though, the scene seems 
a little too flat and lifeless to me, but that's probably just 
a matter of taste.

=====
From gmccarter@hotmail.com:
Good texture on the grass.

=====
From albiaprime@aol.com:
Artistic - Nice composition, but the right side of the picture looks a little empty.
           Perhaps a few birds flying in the sky would help
Technical - I see nothing wrong with the way your tree turned out!  The grass field
            turned out well
Concept - A different interpretation of the topic.