=====
From darwallace@earthlink.net:
A professional product worthy of Bryce.

=====
From pbourke@swin.edu.au:
Good appearance of complexity even though the realism isn't there.

=====
From marlo.steed@uleth.ca:
Nice ambience.  The fish look a bit artifical... need to work on the textures and shapes a bit.

=====
From tony@j4tb.com:
Nice attention to detail.

=====
From gregj56590@aol.com:
Tres beautiful


=====
From Alain.Culos@bigfoot.com:
A nice scene.

=====
From jrcsurvey@aol.com:
As usual, you transform your subject. Lovely, whimsical, you use texture lik=
e a painter piles up paint.
Would I had 1/10th of your sense of composition

=====
From StephenF@whoever.com:
A solid underwater scene.  Most of the fish look good.  
The scene as a whole seems a little busy to me, though, 
and the texture on the large masses of rock could use a 
little work.

=====
From sjlen@ndirect.co.uk:
This is a good looking image, and obviously you've put a lot of work into this
but it looks a touch too bright, and there seems to be a lack of contrast and
not enough definite hard lines anywhere.  Good work. 

=====
From delfeld@mailcity.com:
Your image journal is worth reading.  The one comment I have is to want more contrast between the elements.  The composition works.  Since the theme is as arbitrary as the ocean, I don't know what to give you for interpretation of theme. . .

