=====
From skipt1@aol.com:
A little too on the simple side, but I do like the colors used.  The transparency in the building is a nice touch.
=====
From povray@doublezero.uklinux.net:
Looks nice and relaxing, but the picture doesn't really do it for me. Perhaps a bit more oomph and a bit less empty space top and bottom would get it more points for artistry. Also, using different trees would juice it up for me. A proper description would be good.

=====
From shevlin@uic.edu:
The building and trees are well done, but the scene could use a little more detail, maybe some grass on the ground or clouds in the sky.



=====
From kschwartz@earthlink.net:
I really like the building.  It looks like you are using the same tree over and over.  I would think using several trees or at the very least randomly roating the one tree would have made this a better picture.

=====
From hildurka@simnet.is:

The lack of info in the text file makes it difficult to comment on this one. Nice architectural shape. Looks like an existing building but I canīt remember which one. The fog looks a little bit unrealistic in front of the building but the light is good.
=====
From renebui@aol.com:
More description please.

=====
From phenlikescheese@hotmail.com:
I like your tree, but all of them are exactly the same.

=====
From sshelby@shelbyvision.com:
It bothers me that every tree has one branch that looks 
broken. The building does look monumental, but I 
wouldn't call it epic proportions.


=====
From file:
Notable for modelling


=====
From file:
I love the lighting glow, the sky colour and the sense of early morning in this one. Also the massive building structire which fits the subject so well. It's a shame the trees are "factory produced" - they look very similar (identical?)
Notable for lighting, composition


=====
From file:
I love the lighting glow, the sky colour and the sense of early morning in this one. Also the massive building structire which fits the subject so well. It's a shame the trees are "factory produced" - they look very similar (identical?)
Notable for lighting, composition


=====
From file:
I love the lighting glow, the sky colour and the sense of early morning in this one. Also the massive building structire which fits the subject so well. It's a shame the trees are "factory produced" - they look very similar (identical?)
Notable for lighting, composition


=====
From file:
I love the lighting glow, the sky colour and the sense of early morning in this one. Also the massive building structire which fits the subject so well. It's a shame the trees are "factory produced" - they look very similar (identical?)
Notable for lighting, composition