=====
From helene.dumur@free.fr:
The bridge is quite good, but not the landscape.

=====
From rgow@lanset.com:
Good job on bridge & water.  Landscape could use a better texture, & splash is
not big enough for the scale of the catatrophe.



=====
From t.degroot@inter.nl.net:
The bridge is well done, but I am disappointed by the landscape texturing! Why
not (at least) put a slope/altitude texture there?
(Is that an UFO, in the right background?)

=====
From bertram.henze@t-online.de:
The water looks strangely viscous and heavy - a bit like jelly. The waves look
much like raised by the impact of some single, massive object, not the fragile
tangle of the loose bridge. On the other hand, this makes the picture more
impressive than a realistic foamy splash could do. Oh, and I saw it - the
saucer! 

=====
From slone@hiwaay.net:
A more varied texture showing rust and defects on the bridge 
would help this image tremendously. Great idea.


=====
From file:
Wow, good detail realistic modelling.  god re-use of brideg parts falling, good
distortion of damaged bridge parts.
Notable for modelling, originality


=====
From file:
Fine composition and a nice water texture. It seems to me that there is too much
of the bridge - if you would like to repair it, you would have to cut off at
least 20 meters! The wave is a bit too regular to be that huge.


=====
From file:
Good composition, visually attractive picture. The water seems out of scale with
the bridge (or is it intentionnal?) I believe a slight vapor trail behing the
UFO would have helped understanding that its collision with the bridge was the
cause for the disaster...
Notable for composition


=====
From file:
Physical properties: Bridge too long for break.


=====
From file:
Notable for composition